Copying over something tmp said in the ban thread on jker.

JKER was a mostly inactive poster who had a pre-existing disagreement from years back and seeing the topic raised again they ended up posting about it. The one(1) of two(2) DM’s they sent was a link to the previous time the topic was discussed. The other DM was a suggestion that the best thing to tell/teach problematic players is to let things go.

This thing tmp posted was accurate, as far as I know - pretty sure I was the second person DM’d. It’s a decent enough summary of the message they sent me, after my post in the logs thread. That said:

I didn’t send that conversation to anyone, or mention it anywhere, mostly because I saw it in the middle of work, opened it, then forgot about it. To know that DM had been sent, tmp was either jker, or speaking with info directly from jker.

That’s very much like someone on trial exclaiming “how could she have seen me? I had a mask on!”

JKER was a mostly inactive poster who had a pre-existing disagreement from years back and seeing the topic raised again they ended up posting about it. The one(1) of two(2) DM’s they sent was a link to the previous time the topic was discussed. The other DM was a suggestion that the best thing to tell/teach problematic players is to let things go.

This thing tmp posted was accurate, as far as I know - pretty sure I was the second person DM’d. It’s a decent enough summary of the message they sent me, after my post in the logs thread. That said:

I didn’t send that conversation to anyone, or mention it anywhere, mostly because I saw it in the middle of work, opened it, then forgot about it. To know that DM had been sent, tmp was either jker, or speaking with info directly from jker.

@tmp said in JKER Banned Discussion Thread:

Since they were inactive outside of rehashing ancient arguments, they being banned shouldn’t be much of a loss to anyone even them.

Such rare self-awareness.

Also, good. That username was confusing.