I’m just keeping track.

Shoo, troll.

But I’m pretty sure I’m good about filtering sex pests because I have some female players in my circle and they’ve been consistent for years. They’re good girls, too. If anybody made them unhappy I’d fix it.

I don’t just mean intimacy in the sexual sense, either, though that clearly applies. Pyre’s advice is (always) good, because clearly communicating will let you know if people are open to the type of intimacy you are out for.

anything that you would not be comfortable explaining to a ten year old in front of their loving parents who are also holding shotguns

I’m stealing this.

1. Be honest and straightforward about what sort of play you are looking for. There’s nothing wrong with being there primarily for the TS OR primarily for the combat OR whatever, but:

2. Accept without complaint or attempt to ‘win someone over’ when someone is not interested in the RP that you want.

3. Do not solicit real life details from other players. If they want you to know, they’ll volunteer it.

4. Do not share more than basic RL details to anyone who has not specifically asked. Freely shareable details may include the general line of work you’re in, what region of what country you live in, or the sort of hobbies you would tell your grandmother about. Details that no one needs to know unless they’ve specifically asked and you feel truly comfortable sharing with them may include but not be limited to: your address, your real name, pictures of any part of your body, your kinks, your salary, and any hobbies that you would not be comfortable explaining to a ten year old in front of their loving parents who are also holding shotguns.

5. No is a complete sentence. If someone says that they DO NOT want to do a thing, no matter what that thing is, then they do not have explain themselves and you should not try to persuade them to do the thing. That includes ‘talking to you’ or ‘playing with you’.

6. If someone says “Stop”, OOC, then stop. Do not pass Go, do not collect $200. If someone says “Stop”, IC, then stop, and make sure OOC that they are enthusiastic (not just ‘will tolerate’) about the direction a scene is going in, and let them know that if the scene is not fun for them at any time, you can absolutely do something different or end it without any sort of argument or retribution. Then follow through with that.

7. If an IC event is going to involve harming, humiliating, dominating, punishing, or otherwise doing something painful to another character, check in proactively with the player, and work out boundaries for the scene OOC. This doesn’t have to mean planning out every moment, but you want to establish early and often that communication is good, and that just because someone’s PC is on the bottom of the IC event, it doesn’t mean you’re trying to harm or punish the player. It’s a game. Everyone should have fun.

8. Remember: Nobody on a game owes you anything. Not other players. Not staff. They don’t owe you scenes, or benefits, or specific relationships. No, even if it is written into character backgrounds - it’s a game, and people change. If someone doesn’t scene with you for a while, don’t assume that it’s because they’re avoiding you, or they hate you, or because they’ve been stolen away by that TS hog over there. Usually, it has nothing to do with you, but if you throw a tantrum over it, it WILL. And also, you will be creepy.

9. Helping a new player is not an exchange. Do not do it if you think you’re going to “get something” out of it, or that the new player’s character is going to owe something to yours. Especially do not page new players to see if their character is available for relationships for your desires - and if it is not, do not advise them on how they ‘should’ change their character so it is.

10. Comments on PBs or descs should be family friendly. Again, imagine the ten year old and the parents with shotguns. Do not volunteer the various sexual things you desperately want to do to the actor whose face a character has - or anything you’ve done to your self while looking at a gallery picture or desc. Ten year old. Shotguns. Don’t.

I also agree with @IoleRae that folks who don’t know what “creepy” is need to do some research on their own to see what it means. It’s not up to Staff to define – if someone is creeped out, they can and should ask the person to stop doing what they’re doing; if they keep running into those boundaries, the victim can and should tell the offender to stop contacting them entirely.

If they don’t feel comfortable telling the offender that they’re uncomfortable, they should tell Staff. Then Staff can tell the offender “hey, you recently jumped straight from comforting RP to trying for TS despite the other character giving no indications they wanted that RP, that’s creepy – moderate your behavior or leave the game.” But Staff should never have to build a list of behaviors like “jumping straight from comforting RP to trying for TS despite the other character giving no indications they want that RP” into their policies. Doing that is just asking for some sexpest or creeper to point at the list and say, “I went to drinking tea between comforting RP and trying for TS, so you can’t ban me!”

@JKER said in On the utility of Logs, Receipts, and Proof:

No, you’re not all bigots. loleRae is a bigot.

What you’re bumping up against is the Paradox of Intolerance – what @IoleRae said (in different words, of course) is that tolerance and safety sometimes requires that you be intolerant of behaviors that threaten the safety and tolerant nature of the space. Saying “that action being taken by that neurodivergent person is unacceptable” is not being a bigot toward neurodivergent people.

Annoying: Behavior I would put up with if it is done occasionally. Typically leads down the road towards anger.

Creepy: Behavior that makes me feel dirty and uncomfortable. Typically leads down a road of shame and depression.

Creepy, in this thread, has been used as a shorthand for ‘violating other players’ boundaries either in an egregious single event or by persistent pressure.’ Do you find that to be an actionable definition?

That said, you’re free to remain as bigoted against neurodivergent players as you like.

Hi. I’m GF. I have brain problems. I chose those last four words very deliberately, because the brain problems I mentioned? I have them. They’re mine. They belong to me. They’re not anyone else’s responsibility. If they contribute to me being an asshole, then that is my responsibility too. Others may choose to offer me correction (several people in this forum have done so at various points), and I am grateful for their emotional labor when they do it, but they don’t owe it to me.

Nor do my brain problems absolve me of the responsibility I hold for the outcomes of my actions, because whether or not I intended to be disruptive doesn’t retroactively make the things I did not disruptive, and it won’t prevent any future actions I take from being disruptive. Only not being disruptive will cause my actions to not be disruptive.

I would personally feel deeply insulted, and more than a little hurt, if I found out people were making allowances for me due to my brain problems, because that would infantilize me. It would imply or even outright say that they have no faith I am a competent adult capable of learning from my mistakes and making appropriate changes. I’d rather be kicked from a game than treated like that, because at least when I get kicked off I have the cold comfort of knowing I’m not doing any more harm to people I don’t wish harm upon. I can’t imagine feeling that IoleRae’s hypothetical staff policy toward me is a form of bigotry.

But then, I can’t imagine feeling anything about IoleRae is bigoted toward neurodivergent people because we talk sometimes and she just seems like a super chill person who thinks her positions through and always keeps an eye on the moral and ethical implications of her actions; so maybe that disqualifies my opinion from mattering.

The problem I’ve always had with the term “creepy” is that I find in practice it actually means “I don’t enjoy that in this context with that person.” which makes it effectively impossible for me to figure out what any one person finds to be creepy since not only do different people find different things creepy, they find the same behavior to be creepy/non creepy based on who did it and when they did it.

Lol. The “context” you’re referring to is consent. The only time I have ever found a line between a behavior that people enjoy with one person and find objectionable from another is when it’s being engaged in without permission and without a relationship of trust. If you don’t understand that, yeah, not that surprising that you’re struggling.

This really isn’t that complicated, from one neurodivergent to another.

@Testament said in On the utility of Logs, Receipts, and Proof:

She even bolded it. That’s the whole, entire point, And your conclusion that you’ve drawn from that is, “Well, you’re just all bigots.” Really?

Really?

No, you’re not all bigots. loleRae is a bigot.

Refusing to tolerate harassment/abuse is not bigoted.